You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sleep Strategies of Night-Shift Nurses on Days Off: Which Ones are Most Adaptive?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2014.00277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan E. Petrov, C. Brendan Clark, Hylton E. Molzof, Russell L. Johnson, Karen L. Cropsey, Karen L. Gamble |
| Abstract |
To determine the off-shift sleep strategies of bi-ethnic night-shift nurses, the relationship between these sleep strategies and adaptation to shift work, and identify the participant-level characteristics associated with a given sleep strategy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 15% |
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2015.
All research outputs
#2,647,323
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,483
of 11,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,837
of 353,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#16
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.