You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diffuse Decreased Gray Matter in Patients with Idiopathic Craniocervical Dystonia: A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2014.00283 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camila C. Piccinin, Luiza G. Piovesana, Maria C. A. Santos, Rachel P. Guimarães, Brunno M. De Campos, Thiago J. R. Rezende, Lidiane S. Campos, Fabio R. Torres, Augusto C. Amato-Filho, Marcondes C. França, Iscia Lopes-Cendes, Fernando Cendes, Anelyssa D’Abreu |
| Abstract |
Recent studies have addressed the role of structures other than the basal ganglia in the pathophysiology of craniocervical dystonia (CCD). Neuroimaging studies have attempted to identify structural abnormalities in CCD but a clear pattern of alteration has not been established. We performed whole-brain evaluation using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to identify patterns of gray matter (GM) changes in CCD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 17% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,754,826
of 24,037,774 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,186
of 13,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,321
of 359,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#37
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.