You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pitfalls in the Neuroimaging of Glioblastoma in the Era of Antiangiogenic and Immuno/Targeted Therapy – Detecting Illusive Disease, Defining Response
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2015.00033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raymond Y. Huang, Martha R. Neagu, David A. Reardon, Patrick Y. Wen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#13,173,409
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,943
of 12,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,077
of 256,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#32
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.