↓ Skip to main content

NF-κB in Innate Neuroprotection and Age-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NF-κB in Innate Neuroprotection and Age-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2015.00098
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annamaria Lanzillotta, Vanessa Porrini, Arianna Bellucci, Marina Benarese, Caterina Branca, Edoardo Parrella, Pier Franco Spano, Marina Pizzi

Abstract

NF-κB factors are cardinal transcriptional regulators of inflammation and apoptosis, involved in the brain programing of systemic aging and in brain damage. The composition of NF-κB active dimers and epigenetic mechanisms modulating histone acetylation, finely condition neuronal resilience to brain insults. In stroke models, the activation of NF-κB/c-Rel promotes neuroprotective effects by transcription of specific anti-apoptotic genes. Conversely, aberrant activation of NF-κB/RelA showing reduced level of total acetylation, but site-specific acetylation on lysine 310, triggers the expression of pro-apoptotic genes. Constitutive knockout of c-Rel shatters the resilience of substantia nigra (SN) dopaminergic (DA) neurons to aging and induces a parkinsonian like pathology in mice. c-rel(-/-) mice show increased level of aberrantly acetylated RelA in the basal ganglia, neuroinflammation, accumulation of alpha-synuclein, and iron. Moreover, they develop motor deficits responsive to l-DOPA treatment and associated with loss of DA neurons in the SN. Here, we discuss the effect of unbalanced activation of RelA and c-Rel during aging and propose novel challenges for the development of therapeutic strategies in neurodegenerative diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Neuroscience 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Psychology 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#14,225,412
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,743
of 11,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,484
of 266,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#42
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.