↓ Skip to main content

MRI Characteristics of the Evolution of Supratentorial Recent Small Subcortical Infarcts

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MRI Characteristics of the Evolution of Supratentorial Recent Small Subcortical Infarcts
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2015.00118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuhei Okazaki, Eva Hornberger, Martin Griebe, Achim Gass, Michael G. Hennerici, Kristina Szabo

Abstract

Morphological changes of recent small subcortical infarcts are not well defined. The purpose of the present study was to describe the MRI characteristics of the evolution for this stroke subtype. We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with definite supratentorial recent small subcortical infarcts according to the ASCO classification with baseline and follow-up MRI (≥90 days of stroke onset). We investigated the incidence of cavity formation, the infarct volume change, and the positional relationship between infarct lesions and preexisting white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) of presumed vascular origin. We identified 62 patients with a median age of 71 years (range: 30-87). Median follow-up period was 26 months (range: 3-99). Cavity formation was observed in 38 infarct lesions (61%). Eighteen lesions (29%) were partially adjacent to WMHs and 7 (11%) were fused into WMHs. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, age [odds ratio per 5-year increase: 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.80; p = 0.03] and baseline infarct volume (odds ratio per 1-ml increase: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.6-19.7; p = 0.003) were independent predictors of cavity formation. There was a significant volume reduction between baseline and follow-up infarct lesions (median volume reduction rate: 44%). More than one-third of recent small subcortical infarcts do not lead to cavity formation and 40% of infarct lesions overlap with WMHs. Our data indicate the continuity between recent small subcortical infarcts and WMHs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Neuroscience 3 16%
Computer Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,409,030
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,722
of 11,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,633
of 266,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#60
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.