↓ Skip to main content

Deep Brain Stimulation during Pregnancy and Delivery: Experience from a Series of “DBS Babies”

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep Brain Stimulation during Pregnancy and Delivery: Experience from a Series of “DBS Babies”
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2015.00191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Scelzo, Jan H. Mehrkens, Kai Bötzel, Paul Krack, Alexandre Mendes, Stéphan Chabardès, Mircea Polosan, Eric Seigneuret, Elena Moro, Valerie Fraix

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is widely used to improve quality of life in movement disorders (MD) and psychiatric diseases. Even though the ability to have children has a big impact on patients' life, only a few studies describe the role of DBS in pregnancy. To describe risks and management of women treated by DBS for disabling MD or psychiatric diseases during pregnancy and delivery. We report a retrospective case series of women, followed in two DBS centers, who became pregnant and went on to give birth to a child while suffering from disabling MD or psychiatric diseases [Parkinson's disease, dystonia, Tourette's syndrome (TS), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)] treated by DBS. Clinical status, complications and management before, during, and after pregnancy are reported. Two illustrative cases are described in greater detail. DBS improved motor and behavioral disorders in all patients and allowed reduction in, or even total interruption of disease-specific medication during pregnancy. With the exception of the spontaneous early abortion of one fetus in a twin pregnancy, all pregnancies were uneventful in terms of obstetric and pediatric management. DBS parameters were adjusted in five patients in order to limit clinical worsening during pregnancy. Implanted material limited breast-feeding in one patient because of local pain at submammal stimulator site and led to local discomfort related to stretching of the cable with increasing belly size in another patient whose stimulator was implanted in the abdominal wall. Not only is it safe for young women with MD, TS and OCD who have a DBS-System implanted to become pregnant and give birth to a baby but DBS seems to be the key to becoming pregnant, having children, and thus greatly improves quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 26 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 25%
Neuroscience 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#17,772,019
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,059
of 11,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,036
of 266,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#40
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.