↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic High-Cadence Cycling Improves Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic High-Cadence Cycling Improves Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2015.00194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela L. Ridgel, Robert S. Phillips, Benjamin L. Walter, Fred M. Discenzo, Kenneth A. Loparo

Abstract

Individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) often have deficits in kinesthesia. There is a need for rehabilitation interventions that improve these kinesthetic deficits. Forced (tandem) cycling at a high cadence improves motor function. However, tandem cycling is difficult to implement in a rehabilitation setting. To construct an instrumented, motored cycle and to examine if high cadence dynamic cycling promotes improvements in motor function. This motored cycle had two different modes: dynamic and static cycling. In dynamic mode, the motor maintained 75-85 rpm. In static mode, the rider determined the pedaling cadence. UPDRS Motor III and Timed Up and Go (TUG) were used to assess changes in motor function after three cycling sessions. Individuals in the static group showed a lower cadence but a higher power, torque and heart rate than the dynamic group. UPDRS score showed a significant 13.9% improvement in the dynamic group and only a 0.9% improvement in the static group. There was also a 16.5% improvement in TUG time in the dynamic group but only an 8% improvement in the static group. These findings show that dynamic cycling can improve PD motor function and that activation of proprioceptors with a high cadence but variable pattern may be important for motor improvements in PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 40 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Sports and Recreations 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 46 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,084,388
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#324
of 12,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,575
of 268,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.