↓ Skip to main content

Toward Precision Psychiatry: Statistical Platform for the Personalized Characterization of Natural Behaviors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward Precision Psychiatry: Statistical Platform for the Personalized Characterization of Natural Behaviors
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2016.00008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth B. Torres, Robert W. Isenhower, Jillian Nguyen, Caroline Whyatt, John I. Nurnberger, Jorge V. Jose, Steven M. Silverstein, Thomas V. Papathomas, Jacob Sage, Jonathan Cole

Abstract

There is a critical need for new analytics to personalize behavioral data analysis across different fields, including kinesiology, sports science, and behavioral neuroscience. Specifically, to better translate and integrate basic research into patient care, we need to radically transform the methods by which we describe and interpret movement data. Here, we show that hidden in the "noise," smoothed out by averaging movement kinematics data, lies a wealth of information that selectively differentiates neurological and mental disorders such as Parkinson's disease, deafferentation, autism spectrum disorders, and schizophrenia from typically developing and typically aging controls. In this report, we quantify the continuous forward-and-back pointing movements of participants from a large heterogeneous cohort comprising typical and pathological cases. We empirically estimate the statistical parameters of the probability distributions for each individual in the cohort and report the parameter ranges for each clinical group after characterization of healthy developing and aging groups. We coin this newly proposed platform for individualized behavioral analyses "precision phenotyping" to distinguish it from the type of observational-behavioral phenotyping prevalent in clinical studies or from the "one-size-fits-all" model in basic movement science. We further propose the use of this platform as a unifying statistical framework to characterize brain disorders of known etiology in relation to idiopathic neurological disorders with similar phenotypic manifestations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 19 19%
Psychology 12 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,266,175
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,337
of 12,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,091
of 400,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#32
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.