↓ Skip to main content

Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurorehabilitation: The Modulatory Effect of Sleep

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurorehabilitation: The Modulatory Effect of Sleep
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2016.00054
Pubmed ID
Authors

James K. Ebajemito, Leonardo Furlan, Christoph Nissen, Annette Sterr

Abstract

The relationship between sleep disorders and neurological disorders is often reciprocal, such that sleep disorders are worsened by neurological symptoms and that neurological disorders are aggravated by poor sleep. Animal and human studies further suggest that sleep disruption not only worsens single neurological symptoms but may also lead to long-term negative outcomes. This suggests that sleep may play a fundamental role in neurorehabilitation and recovery. We further propose that sleep may not only alter the efficacy of behavioral treatments but also plasticity-enhancing adjunctive neurostimulation methods, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). At present, sleep receives little attention in the fields of neurorehabilitation and neurostimulation. In this review, we draw together the strands of evidence from both fields of research to highlight the proposition that sleep is an important parameter to consider in the application of tDCS as a primary or adjunct rehabilitation intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 24 22%
Psychology 22 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,572,760
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,262
of 14,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,801
of 316,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#23
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.