↓ Skip to main content

Zika Virus Infection and Guillain–Barré Syndrome in Three Patients from Suriname

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zika Virus Infection and Guillain–Barré Syndrome in Three Patients from Suriname
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2016.00233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Langerak, Harvey Yang, Mark Baptista, Laura Doornekamp, Tessa Kerkman, John Codrington, Jimmy Roosblad, Stephen G. S. Vreden, Erwin De Bruin, Ramona Mögling, Bart C. Jacobs, Suzan D. Pas, Corine H. GeurtsvanKessel, Chantal B. E. M. Reusken, Marion P. Koopmans, Eric C. M. Van Gorp, Henk Alberga

Abstract

We present three patients from Suriname who were diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) during the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak in this country. One patient had a positive ZIKV urine real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) result. The other two patients had a negative ZIKV urine qRT-PCR but a positive virus neutralization test and presence of IgG antibodies against ZIKV in the serum. Considering the evidence of a past ZIKV infection and absence of evidence for recent infections with the most common preceding infections of GBS, it is very likely that these GBS cases were triggered by ZIKV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,402,319
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,180
of 11,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,928
of 420,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#30
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.