↓ Skip to main content

Exploring Braak’s Hypothesis of Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
19 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
801 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring Braak’s Hypothesis of Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen D. Rietdijk, Paula Perez-Pardo, Johan Garssen, Richard J. A. van Wezel, Aletta D. Kraneveld

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder for which there is no cure. Most patients suffer from sporadic PD, which is likely caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Braak's hypothesis states that sporadic PD is caused by a pathogen that enters the body via the nasal cavity, and subsequently is swallowed and reaches the gut, initiating Lewy pathology (LP) in the nose and the digestive tract. A staging system describing the spread of LP from the peripheral to the central nervous system was also postulated by the same research group. There has been criticism to Braak's hypothesis, in part because not all patients follow the proposed staging system. Here, we review literature that either supports or criticizes Braak's hypothesis, focused on the enteric route, digestive problems in patients, the spread of LP on a tissue and a cellular level, and the toxicity of the protein αSynuclein (αSyn), which is the major constituent of LP. We conclude that Braak's hypothesis is supported by in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence. However, we also conclude that the staging system of Braak only describes a specific subset of patients with young onset and long duration of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 801 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 800 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 135 17%
Student > Master 107 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 12%
Researcher 61 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 6%
Other 81 10%
Unknown 274 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 148 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 103 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 85 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 3%
Other 103 13%
Unknown 291 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#295,405
of 25,037,495 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#102
of 14,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,812
of 437,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#2
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,037,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.