↓ Skip to main content

Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inger Havsteen, Anders Ohlhues, Kristoffer H. Madsen, Janus Damm Nybing, Hanne Christensen, Anders Christensen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 55 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 13%
Engineering 19 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Physics and Astronomy 13 6%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 72 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,442,776
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,241
of 14,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,123
of 330,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#42
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.