↓ Skip to main content

An Arterial Spin Labeling MRI Perfusion Study of Migraine without Aura Attacks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Arterial Spin Labeling MRI Perfusion Study of Migraine without Aura Attacks
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raquel Gil-Gouveia, Joana Pinto, Patricia Figueiredo, Pedro Ferro Vilela, Isabel Pavão Martins

Abstract

Studies of brain perfusion during migraine without aura attacks have inconsistent results. Arterial spin labeling MRI, a non-invasive quantitative perfusion technique, was used to prospectively study a spontaneous untreated migraine without aura attack and a headache-free period. Image analysis used FSL and MATLAB software; Group analysis used permutation methods for perfusion differences between sessions. Thirteen women (age 35.7) were scanned during an attack of an average intensity of 6.8 (on 0-10 Visual Analog Scale) and 16 h duration. No global or regional perfusion differences were identified when comparing migraine and migraine-free sessions. Our findings suggest that the painful phase of migraine without aura attacks is not associated with brain perfusion abnormalities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Other 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Neuroscience 7 19%
Engineering 4 11%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,429,992
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,885
of 11,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,129
of 315,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#139
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.