↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and Tolerability of Gabapentin in Adults with Sleep Disturbance in Medical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and Tolerability of Gabapentin in Adults with Sleep Disturbance in Medical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guang Jian Liu, Rezaul Karim, Li Li Xu, Song Lin Wang, Chao Yang, Li Ding, Yun-Fu Wang

Abstract

The aim of this study was to systematically review the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin in the treatment of sleep disturbance in patients with medical illness. PubMed was searched for randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials that reported sleep changes during gabapentin treatment up to November 2015. This review included 26 studies involving 4,684 participants. Except for Composite Endpoint 3 [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.05-0.22] compared with the placebo group, the gabapentin group showed superior outcomes on our endpoints: Composite Endpoint 1 (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.71), Composite Endpoint 2 (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.30), Composite Endpoint 4 (SMD = -0.38, 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.19), Composite Endpoint 5 [risk ratio (RR) = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.24-2.58], and Composite Endpoint 6 (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32-0.72). However, the patients in the gabapentin group showed worse tolerance than those in the placebo group (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08-1.76). This study is the first to systematically assess the clinical value of gabapentin for the treatment of sleep disorders. We found that regardless the type of sleep outcomes, gabapentin displayed stable treatment efficacy for sleep disturbance in patients with medical illness. However, when an average dose of approximately 1,800 mg/day was used, the risk of treatment discontinuation or drug withdrawal was relatively high. We recommend that further studies confirm these findings in patients with primary sleep disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 35%
Other 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,126,884
of 25,208,845 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,610
of 14,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,501
of 318,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#59
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,208,845 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.