You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of MicroRNAs in Aβ Deposition and Tau Phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2017.00342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juanjuan Zhao, Dongxu Yue, Ya Zhou, Li Jia, Hairong Wang, Mengmeng Guo, Hualin Xu, Chao Chen, Jidong Zhang, Lin Xu |
| Abstract |
Alzheimer's disease (AD), with main clinical features of progressive impairment in cognitive and behavioral functions, is the most common degenerative disease of the central nervous system. Recent evidence showed that microRNAs (miRNAs) played important roles in the pathological progression of AD. In this article, we reviewed the promising role of miRNAs in both Aβ deposition and Tau phosphorylation, two key pathological characters in the pathological progression of AD, which might be helpful for the understanding of pathogenesis and the development of new strategies of clinical diagnosis and treatment of AD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 14 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,470,944
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,816
of 11,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,927
of 314,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#114
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.