↓ Skip to main content

Repeatability and Reproducibility of Retinal Neuronal and Axonal Measures on Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Cognitive Impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Retinal Neuronal and Axonal Measures on Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Cognitive Impairment
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00359
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edwin Hong-Teck Loh, Yi-Ting Ong, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian, Saima Hilal, Naing Thet, Tien Yin Wong, Christopher P. L. Chen, Carol Yim-lui Cheung

Abstract

With increasing interest in determining if measurement of retinal neuronal structure with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is useful in accessing neurodegenerative process in cognitive decline and development of dementia, it is important to evaluate whether the SD-OCT measurements are repeatable and reproducible in these patients. This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with no change in global clinical dementia rating (CDR) score at 1-year follow-up were eligible to be included. Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters were measured with SD-OCT at baseline, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up visits. At baseline, SD-OCT scans were repeated to access intra-visit repeatability of the SD-OCT measurement. SD-OCT measurement over three visits was used to access inter-visit reproducibility. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CoVs). We included 32 patients with stable AD and 29 patients with stable MCI in the final analysis. For GC-IPL measures, the average intra-visit ICC was 0.969 (range: 0.948-0.985), and CoV was 1.81% (range: 1.14-2.40); while the average inter-visit ICC was 0.968 (0.941-0.985), and CoV was 1.91% (range: 1.24-2.32). The average ICC and CoV of intra-visit RNFL measured were 0.965 (range: 0.937-0.986) and 2.32% (range: 1.34-2.90%), respectively. The average ICC and CoV of inter-visit RNFL measures were 0.927 (range: 0.845-0.961) and 3.83% (range: 2.71-5.25%), respectively. Both GC-IPL and RNFL measurements had good intra-visit repeatability and inter-visit reproducibility over 1 year in elderly patients with no decline in cognitive function, suggesting that SD-OCT is a reliable tool to assess neurodegenerative process over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 26%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Psychology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#20,442,790
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,907
of 11,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,398
of 316,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#159
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.