↓ Skip to main content

REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Is Not Associated with a More Rapid Cognitive Decline in Mild Dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Is Not Associated with a More Rapid Cognitive Decline in Mild Dementia
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiza Chwiszczuk, Monica Haraldseid Breitve, Kolbjørn Brønnick, Michaela D. Gjerstad, Minna Hynninen, Dag Aarsland, Arvid Rongve

Abstract

REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is associated with cognitive dysfunctions and is a risk factor for development of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. However, it is unknown whether RBD is associated with faster cognitive decline in already established dementia. The main goal of this study was to determine if patients with mild dementia with and without RBD differ in progression rate and in specific neuropsychological measures over 4-year follow-up. This longitudinal, prospective study based on data from the DemVest study compares neuropsychological measures in a mild dementia cohort. A diagnosis of probable RBD (pRBD) was made based on the Mayo Sleep Questionnaire. Neuropsychological domains were assessed by Mini Mental State Examination, total score and figure copying, California Verbal Learning Test-II, Visual Object and Space Perception Cube and Silhouettes, Boston Naming Test, Stroop test, Verbal Category Fluency, Trail Making Test A and B. Among the 246 subjects, 47 (19.1%) had pRBD at the baseline, and pRBD group was younger and with male predominance. During 4-year follow-up, we did not observe any significant differences in the rate of decline in neuropsychological measures. Patients with pRBD performed generally poorer in visuoconstructional, visuoperceptual, and executive/attention tests in comparison to RBD negative. We did not find any significant differences in progression rate of neurocognitive outcomes between dementia patients with and without RBD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Psychology 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#21,087,947
of 23,733,540 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#9,388
of 12,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,730
of 318,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#152
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,733,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.