You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relationship between Sleep Duration and Risk Factors for Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2017.00392 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun Seng Phua, Lata Jayaram, Tissa Wijeratne |
| Abstract |
Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. While various risk factors have been identified, sleep has only been considered a risk factor more recently. Various epidemiologic studies have associated stroke with sleep such as sleep duration, and laboratory and clinical studies have proposed various underlying mechanisms. The pathophysiology is multifactorial, especially considering sleep affects many common risk factors for stroke. This review aims to provide an outline of the effect of sleep duration on common stroke risk factors. Appropriate sleep duration, especially in patients who have stroke risk factors, and increasing awareness and screening for sleep quality may contribute to primary prevention of stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 6 | 15% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#755,706
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#251
of 14,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,491
of 328,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#12
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.