You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential Diagnosis of Vertigo in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Validation Study of the STANDING Algorithm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2017.00590 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simone Vanni, Rudi Pecci, Jonathan A. Edlow, Peiman Nazerian, Rossana Santimone, Giuseppe Pepe, Marco Moretti, Andrea Pavellini, Cosimo Caviglioli, Claudia Casula, Sofia Bigiarini, Paolo Vannucchi, Stefano Grifoni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 22% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,131,402
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#367
of 14,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,240
of 343,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#7
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.