↓ Skip to main content

Technologies for Advanced Gait and Balance Assessments in People with Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technologies for Advanced Gait and Balance Assessments in People with Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2017.00708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille J. Shanahan, Frederique M. C. Boonstra, L. Eduardo Cofré Lizama, Myrte Strik, Bradford A. Moffat, Fary Khan, Trevor J. Kilpatrick, Anneke van der Walt, Mary P. Galea, Scott C. Kolbe

Abstract

Subtle gait and balance dysfunction is a precursor to loss of mobility in multiple sclerosis (MS). Biomechanical assessments using advanced gait and balance analysis technologies can identify these subtle changes and could be used to predict mobility loss early in the disease. This update critically evaluates advanced gait and balance analysis technologies and their applicability to identifying early lower limb dysfunction in people with MS. Non-wearable (motion capture systems, force platforms, and sensor-embedded walkways) and wearable (pressure and inertial sensors) biomechanical analysis systems have been developed to provide quantitative gait and balance assessments. Non-wearable systems are highly accurate, reliable and provide detailed outcomes, but require cumbersome and expensive equipment. Wearable systems provide less detail but can be used in community settings and can provide real-time feedback to patients and clinicians. Biomechanical analysis using advanced gait and balance analysis technologies can identify changes in gait and balance in early MS and consequently have the potential to significantly improve monitoring of mobility changes in MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 46 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 26 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 13%
Neuroscience 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 56 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,569,073
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,721
of 12,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,274
of 440,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#34
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.