↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Characteristics and Etiology of Bilateral Vestibular Loss in a Cohort from Central Illinois

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Characteristics and Etiology of Bilateral Vestibular Loss in a Cohort from Central Illinois
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge C. Kattah

Abstract

Previous series of bilateral vestibular loss (BVL) identified numerous etiologies, but surprisingly, a cause in a significant number of cases remains unknown. In an effort to understand possible etiology and management strategies, a global effort is currently in progress. Here, I contribute my 10-year experience with both acute and chronic BVL during the 2007-2017 decade. This is a retrospective review of the charts and EMR of patients diagnosed with BVL in the last 10 years. Following Institutional IRB approval, we identified 57 patients with a diagnosis of BVL and utilized the current diagnostic criteria listed by the Barany society (1). The inclusion criteria included patients with BVL of any cause, within an age span older than 18 and a neuro-otologic examination supporting the clinical impression of BVL. During the current decade 2007-2017, I identified two broad categories of BVL (acute and chronic) in 57 patients; only 41 of them had records available. The etiology includes: idiopathic:n = 9, Wernicke's encephalopathyn = 11, superficial siderosisn = 3, paraneoplastic syndrome:n = 3, bilateral vestibular neuritis (recurrent AVS lasting days without cochlear symptoms)n = 3, simultaneous ototoxicity of aminoglycoside and chemotherapy toxicityn = 2, MELASn = 2, Meniere's disease treated with intra-tympanic streptomycin in one earn = 1, acute phenytoin intoxication:n = 1, combined chronic unilateral tumor-related vestibulopathy and new contralateral vestibular neuritis (this patient presented with Betcherew's phenomenon)n = 1, bilateral AICA stroken = 1, mixed spinocerebellar ataxia type 3,n = 2 and CANVASn = 2. This cohort included a 28% overall incidence of acute and subacute BVL; among them, 65% improved with intervention. In the thiamine deficiency group, specifically, the vestibular function improved in 80% of the patients. Even though acute, subacute, or chronic showed slightly asymmetric horizontal-VOR gain loss, it never did cause spontaneous, primary straight gaze horizontal nystagmus.n = 39/41 patients had abnormal manual HIT,n = 26/41 BVL patients tested with video head impulse immediately after manual testing showed decreased VOR gain, including two with covert saccades. Two thiamine patients with positive bedside pretreatment manual HIT, tested after treatment with high-dose thiamine showed improved VOR. In acute thiamine deficiency, the horizontal VOR was abnormal and the vertical was either normal or mildly decreased. This series favored a neurologic cause of BVL. Finally, 20% of the chronic cases were idiopathic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 12 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,314,737
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,719
of 11,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,907
of 331,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#117
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.