↓ Skip to main content

Impairment in Respiratory Function Contributes to Olfactory Impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impairment in Respiratory Function Contributes to Olfactory Impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00079
Pubmed ID
Authors

René Günther, Wiebke Schrempf, Antje Hähner, Thomas Hummel, Martin Wolz, Alexander Storch, Andreas Hermann

Abstract

Nonmotor symptoms are very common in neurodegenerative diseases. In patients suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), olfactory dysfunction was first reported more than 20 years ago; however, its pathophysiological correlates and further implications remain elusive. In this so far largest case-control study, we analyzed olfactory performance with the "Sniffin' Sticks," a validated olfactory testing kit used in clinical routine. This test kit was designed to investigate different qualities of olfaction including odor threshold, odor discrimination, and odor identification. ALS patients were mildly but significantly impaired in TDI score, the composite of the three subtests (ALS 27.7 ± 7.9, Controls 32.3 ± 5.8). In contrast to Parkinson's disease, ALS patients did not show impaired performance in the suprathreshold tests identification and discrimination. However, the odor threshold was markedly decreased (ALS 6.0 ± 3.4, Controls 8.77 ± 3.6). This pattern of olfactory loss resembles sinonasal diseases, where olfactory dysfunction results from impeded odorant transmission to the olfactory cleft. The evaluation of medical history and clinical data of ALS patients showed that patients with perception of dyspnea (TDI 25.7 ± 8.0) performed significantly worse in olfactory testing compared to those who did not (TDI 30.0 ± 7.4). In line with that, we found that in patients with preserved respiratory function (vital capacity >70% of index value), olfactory performance did not differ from healthy controls. These findings suggest that the mild impairment of olfaction in patients suffering from ALS should at least partly be considered as a consequence of impaired respiratory function, and odor threshold might be a marker of respiratory dysfunction in ALS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,665,040
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,443
of 12,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,502
of 331,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#22
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.