↓ Skip to main content

Bedsided Transcranial Sonographic Monitoring for Expansion and Progression of Subdural Hematoma Compared to Computed Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bedsided Transcranial Sonographic Monitoring for Expansion and Progression of Subdural Hematoma Compared to Computed Tomography
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00374
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolf-Dirk Niesen, Michael Rosenkranz, Cornelius Weiller

Abstract

Transcranial high-resolution ultrasonography reliably allows diagnosis and monitoring of intracerebral hemorrhage in adults. Sonographic monitoring of subdural hematoma (SDH) has not been evaluated in adults so far. This study investigates the reliability of transcranial gray-scale sonography (TGS) in monitoring acute and chronic SDH in adults. TGS was performed in 47 consecutive patients with either acute or chronic SDH confirmed by cerebral CT. Four patients were excluded due to insufficient bone window. After identification of SDH in TGS extent was measured and correlated with extent of SDH on cerebral computer tomography (CCT). If possible measurement was performed at least on 2 days to evaluate the possibility to monitor SDH with TGS. In 43 patients with SDH, 76 examinations were performed with 2 examinations in 23 patients and 3 examinations in 10 patients. Overall extent of SDH correlated significantly between TGS and CCT (r = 0.962). Accordingly correlation was high during each single examination time point. In patients in need for surgical evacuation sonographic measurement yielded a sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 93.8% in predicting surgical evacuation (p < 0.001). Imaging of SDH with TGS is possible in patients with SDH and extent of SDH correlates significantly between TGS and CCT during initial as well as during follow-up examination. Thus monitoring of SDH with TGS at patients' bedside is possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 12 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Engineering 3 12%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,002,907
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,193
of 11,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,414
of 330,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#150
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.