↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Mutation of GARS in a Chinese Family With Distal Hereditary Motor Neuropathy Type V

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Mutation of GARS in a Chinese Family With Distal Hereditary Motor Neuropathy Type V
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00571
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xueying Yu, Bin Chen, Hefei Tang, Wei Li, Ying Fu, Zaiqiang Zhang, Yaping Yan

Abstract

Glycyl-tRNA synthetase (GARS) gene mutations have been reported to be associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 2D and distal hereditary motor neuropathy type V (dHMN-V). In this study, we report a novel GARS mutation in a Chinese family with dHMN-V. Clinical, electromyogram, genetic, and functional data were explored. The proband was an 11-year-old girl presented with progressive distal limb muscle weakness and atrophy due to peripheral motor neuropathy for 1 year. Another five members from three successive generations of the family showed similar symptoms during their first to second decades and demonstrated an autosomal dominant inheritance. The results of genetic testing revealed a novel c.383T>G mutation in the GARS gene in the affected individuals, showing apparent genetic cosegregation. Further bioinformatic analyses showed that the c.383T > G mutation resulted in L128R alteration in the second functional protein domain, and the mutation site was well conserved among different species. In silico analysis predicted that this mutation probably affected protein function. In vitro, this GARS mutation led to a different protein localization pattern than that of the wild-type enzyme. The study found a novel GARS mutation of c.383T > G causing dHMN-V with subcellular localization abnormity in a genetic cosegregation family. These findings broaden the mutational spectrum of GARS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,909
of 12,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,701
of 329,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#197
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.