↓ Skip to main content

Selective Brain Cooling Reduces Motor Deficits Induced by Combined Traumatic Brain Injury, Hypoxemia and Hemorrhagic Shock

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selective Brain Cooling Reduces Motor Deficits Induced by Combined Traumatic Brain Injury, Hypoxemia and Hemorrhagic Shock
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lai Yee Leung, Katherine Cardiff, Xiaofang Yang, Bernard Srambical Wilfred, Janice Gilsdorf, Deborah Shear

Abstract

Selective brain cooling (SBC) can potentially maximize the neuroprotective benefits of hypothermia for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients without the complications of whole body cooling. We have previously developed a method that involved extraluminal cooling of common carotid arteries, and demonstrated the feasibility, safety and efficacy for treating isolated TBI in rats. The present study evaluated the neuroprotective effects of 4-h SBC in a rat model of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury (PBBI) combined with hypoxemic and hypotensive insults (polytrauma). Rats were randomly assigned into two groups: PBBI+polytrauma without SBC (PHH) and PBBI+polytrauma with SBC treatment (PHH+SBC). All animals received unilateral PBBI, followed by 30-min hypoxemia (fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.1) and then 30-min hemorrhagic hypotension (mean arterial pressure = 40 mmHg). Fluid resuscitation was given immediately following hypotension. SBC was initiated 15 min after fluid resuscitation and brain temperature was maintained at 32-33°C (core temperature at ~36.5°C) for 4 h under isoflurane anesthesia. The PHH group received the same procedures minus the cooling. At 7, 10, and 21 days post-injury, motor function was assessed using the rotarod task. Cognitive function was assessed using the Morris water maze at 13-17 days post-injury. At 21 days post-injury, blood samples were collected and the animals were transcardially perfused for subsequent histological analyses. SBC transiently augmented cardiovascular function, as indicated by the increase in mean arterial pressure and heart rate during cooling. Significant improvement in motor functions were detected in SBC-treated polytrauma animals at 7, 10, and 21 days post-injury compared to the control group (p < 0.05). However, no significant beneficial effects were detected on cognitive measures following SBC treatment in the polytrauma animals. In addition, the blood serum and plasma levels of cytokines interleukin-1 and -10 were comparable between the two groups. Histological results also did not reveal any between-group differences in subacute neurodegeneration and astrocyte/ microglial activation. In summary, 4-h SBC delivered through extraluminal cooling of the common carotid arteries effectively ameliorated motor deficits induced by PBBI and polytrauma. Improving cognitive function or mitigating subacute neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation might require a different cooling regimen such as extended cooling, a slow rewarming period and a lower temperature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,542,250
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,877
of 12,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,055
of 331,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#166
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.