↓ Skip to main content

Conscious While Being Considered in an Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome for 20 Years

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conscious While Being Considered in an Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome for 20 Years
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00671
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, Vanessa Charland-Verville, Aurore Thibaut, Camille Chatelle, Jean-Flory L. Tshibanda, Audrey Maudoux, Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville, Steven Laureys, Olivia Gosseries

Abstract

Despite recent advances in our understanding of consciousness disorders, accurate diagnosis of severely brain-damaged patients is still a major clinical challenge. We here present the case of a patient who was considered in an unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state for 20 years. Repeated standardized behavioral examinations combined to neuroimaging assessments allowed us to show that this patient was in fact fully conscious and was able to functionally communicate. We thus revised the diagnosis into an incomplete locked-in syndrome, notably because the main brain lesion was located in the brainstem. Clinical examinations of severe brain injured patients suffering from serious motor impairment should systematically include repeated standardized behavioral assessments and, when possible, neuroimaging evaluations encompassing magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 18 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Psychology 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,996,509
of 24,930,865 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#885
of 14,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,473
of 340,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#21
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,930,865 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.