You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcome Measures for Central Nervous System Evaluation in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 May Be Confounded by Deficits in Motor Function or Insight
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2018.00780 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark J. Hamilton, John McLean, Sarah Cumming, Bob Ballantyne, Josephine McGhie, Ravi Jampana, Cheryl Longman, Jonathan J. Evans, Darren G. Monckton, Maria Elena Farrugia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,141,707
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,542
of 12,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,213
of 343,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#121
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.