You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Clopidogrel and Ticlopidine/Ginkgo Biloba in Patients With Clopidogrel Resistance and Carotid Stenting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2019.00044 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jong-Won Chung, Suk Jae Kim, Jaechun Hwang, Mi Ji Lee, Jun Lee, Kyung-Yul Lee, Man-Seok Park, Sang Min Sung, Keon Ha Kim, Pyoung Jeon, Oh Young Bang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 19% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,152,734
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,550
of 12,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,585
of 438,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#116
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.