You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional Ultrasound Imaging of Spinal Cord Hemodynamic Responses to Epidural Electrical Stimulation: A Feasibility Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2019.00279 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pengfei Song, Carlos A. Cuellar, Shanshan Tang, Riazul Islam, Hai Wen, Chengwu Huang, Armando Manduca, Joshua D. Trzasko, Bruce E. Knudsen, Kendall H. Lee, Shigao Chen, Igor A. Lavrov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 13 | 21% |
| Engineering | 8 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,040,756
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,228
of 12,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,310
of 351,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#222
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.