↓ Skip to main content

Influence of the Intensive Care Unit Environment on the Reliability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of the Intensive Care Unit Environment on the Reliability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2019.00734
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Nikolaus Stienen, Olivia Geisseler, Julia Velz, Nicolai Maldaner, Martina Sebök, Noemi Dannecker, Yannick Rothacher, Ladina Schlosser, Nicolas Roydon Smoll, Emanuela Keller, Peter Brugger, Luca Regli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 15 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Psychology 5 11%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,093,603
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,528
of 12,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,272
of 350,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#174
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.