Title |
Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.00464 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kimberley Allen-Philbey, Rod Middleton, Katie Tuite-Dalton, Elaine Baker, Andrea Stennett, Christo Albor, Klaus Schmierer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Italy | 1 | 9% |
India | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,652,265
of 25,468,789 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#612
of 14,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,341
of 434,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#32
of 415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.