↓ Skip to main content

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, MR Angiography, and Baseline Data in a Systematic Multicenter Analysis of 3,301 MRI Scans of Ischemic Stroke Patients—Neuroradiological Review Within the MRI-GENIE Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, MR Angiography, and Baseline Data in a Systematic Multicenter Analysis of 3,301 MRI Scans of Ischemic Stroke Patients—Neuroradiological Review Within the MRI-GENIE Study
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2020.00577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mattias Drake, Petrea Frid, Björn M. Hansen, Ona Wu, Anne-Katrin Giese, Markus D. Schirmer, Kathleen Donahue, Lisa Cloonan, Robert E. Irie, Mark J. R. J. Bouts, Elissa C. McIntosh, Steven J. T. Mocking, Adrian V. Dalca, Ramesh Sridharan, Huichun Xu, Eva Giralt-Steinhauer, Lukas Holmegaard, Katarina Jood, Jaume Roquer, John W. Cole, Patrick F. McArdle, Joseph P. Broderick, Jordi Jiménez-Conde, Christina Jern, Brett M. Kissela, Dawn O. Kleindorfer, Robin Lemmens, James F. Meschia, Tatjana Rundek, Ralph L. Sacco, Reinhold Schmidt, Pankaj Sharma, Agnieszka Slowik, Vincent Thijs, Daniel Woo, Bradford B. Worrall, Steven J. Kittner, Braxton D. Mitchell, Jonathan Rosand, Polina Golland, Arne Lindgren, Natalia S. Rost, Johan Wassélius

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 15 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Unspecified 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,095,686
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,756
of 14,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,072
of 436,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#140
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.