You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New Algorithms Improving PML Risk Stratification in MS Patients Treated With Natalizumab
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.579438 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inmaculada Toboso, Amalia Tejeda-Velarde, Roberto Alvarez-Lafuente, Rafael Arroyo, Harald Hegen, Florian Deisenhammer, Susana Sainz de la Maza, José C. Alvarez-Cermeño, Guillermo Izquierdo, Dolores Paramo, Pedro Oliva, Bonaventura Casanova, Eduardo Agüera-Morales, Diego Franciotta, Matteo Gastaldi, Oscar Fernández, Patricia Urbaneja, José M. Garcia-Dominguez, Fernando Romero, Alicia Laroni, Antonio Uccelli, Angel Perez-Sempere, Albert Saiz, Yolanda Blanco, Daniela Galimberti, Elio Scarpini, Carmen Espejo, Xavier Montalban, Ludwig Rasche, Friedemann Paul, Inés González, Elena Álvarez, Cristina Ramo, Ana B. Caminero, Yolanda Aladro, Carmen Calles, Pablo Eguía, Antonio Belenguer-Benavides, Lluis Ramió-Torrentà, Ester Quintana, José E. Martínez-Rodríguez, Agustín Oterino, Carlos López de Silanes, Luis I. Casanova, Lamberto Landete, Jette Frederiksen, Gabriel Bsteh, Patricia Mulero, Manuel Comabella, Miguel A. Hernández, Mercedes Espiño, José M. Prieto, Domingo Pérez, María Otano, Francisco Padilla, Juan A. García-Merino, Laura Navarro, Alfonso Muriel, Lucienne Costa Frossard, Luisa M. Villar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 5 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,279,772
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,691
of 12,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,375
of 475,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#303
of 589 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 589 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.