You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Remote Assessment of Post-Stroke Elbow Function Using Internet-Based Telerobotics: A Proof-of-Concept Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.640537 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonghyun Kim, Minki Sin, Won-Seok Kim, Yu-Sun Min, Woojin Kim, Daegeun Park, Nam-Jong Paik, Kyujin Cho, Hyung-Soon Park |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 53% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 53% |
| Engineering | 2 | 12% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,284,124
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,513
of 12,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,785
of 506,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#318
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.