You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Multi-Partner Consortium to Expand Dementia Research in Latin America (ReDLat): Driving Multicentric Research and Implementation Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2021.631722 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Agustin Ibanez, Jennifer S. Yokoyama, Katherine L. Possin, Diana Matallana, Francisco Lopera, Ricardo Nitrini, Leonel T. Takada, Nilton Custodio, Ana Luisa Sosa Ortiz, José Alberto Avila-Funes, Maria Isabel Behrens, Andrea Slachevsky, Richard M. Myers, J. Nicholas Cochran, Luis Ignacio Brusco, Martin A. Bruno, Sonia M. D. Brucki, Stefanie Danielle Pina-Escudero, Maira Okada de Oliveira, Patricio Donnelly Kehoe, Adolfo M. Garcia, Juan Felipe Cardona, Hernando Santamaria-Garcia, Sebastian Moguilner, Claudia Duran-Aniotz, Enzo Tagliazucchi, Marcelo Maito, Erika Mariana Longoria Ibarrola, Maritza Pintado-Caipa, Maria Eugenia Godoy, Vera Bakman, Shireen Javandel, Kenneth S. Kosik, Victor Valcour, Bruce L. Miller |
| Abstract |
Dementia is becoming increasingly prevalent in Latin America, contrasting with stable or declining rates in North America and Europe. This scenario places unprecedented clinical, social, and economic burden upon patients, families, and health systems. The challenges prove particularly pressing for conditions with highly specific diagnostic and management demands, such as frontotemporal dementia. Here we introduce a research and networking initiative designed to tackle these ensuing hurdles, the Multi-partner consortium to expand dementia research in Latin America (ReDLat). First, we present ReDLat's regional research framework, aimed at identifying the unique genetic, social, and economic factors driving the presentation of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease in Latin America relative to the US. We describe ongoing ReDLat studies in various fields and ongoing research extensions. Then, we introduce actions coordinated by ReDLat and the Latin America and Caribbean Consortium on Dementia (LAC-CD) to develop culturally appropriate diagnostic tools, regional visibility and capacity building, diplomatic coordination in local priority areas, and a knowledge-to-action framework toward a regional action plan. Together, these research and networking initiatives will help to establish strong cross-national bonds, support the implementation of regional dementia plans, enhance health systems' infrastructure, and increase translational research collaborations across the continent. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 27% |
| Chile | 4 | 9% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 73% |
| Scientists | 8 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#857,894
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#280
of 14,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,516
of 452,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#14
of 542 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 542 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.