You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment Methods of Post-stroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Technology-Driven Approaches to Gait Characterization and Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2021.650024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dhanya Menoth Mohan, Ahsan Habib Khandoker, Sabahat Asim Wasti, Sarah Ismail Ibrahim Ismail Alali, Herbert F. Jelinek, Kinda Khalaf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 232 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 106 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 32 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 121 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,454,319
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,243
of 14,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,878
of 461,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#116
of 623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.