You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Clinical and Neurophysiological Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2021.695910 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Guidetti, Roberta Ferrucci, Maurizio Vergari, Giada Aglieco, Anisa Naci, Sara Versace, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Stefano Giannoni-Luza, Sergio Barbieri, Alberto Priori, Tommaso Bocci |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 6 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,490,161
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#5,808
of 12,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,349
of 429,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#250
of 657 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 657 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.