You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LIPAD (LRRK2/Luebeck International Parkinson's Disease) Study Protocol: Deep Phenotyping of an International Genetic Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2021.710572 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tatiana Usnich, Eva-Juliane Vollstedt, Nathalie Schell, Volha Skrahina, Xenia Bogdanovic, Hanaa Gaber, Toni M. Förster, Andreas Heuer, Natalia Koleva-Alazeh, Ilona Csoti, Ayse Nazli Basak, Sibel Ertan, Gencer Genc, Peter Bauer, Katja Lohmann, Anne Grünewald, Emma L. Schymanski, Joanne Trinh, Susen Schaake, Daniela Berg, Doreen Gruber, Stuart H. Isaacson, Andrea A. Kühn, Brit Mollenhauer, David J. Pedrosa, Kathrin Reetz, Esther M. Sammler, Enza Maria Valente, Franco Valzania, Jens Volkmann, Simone Zittel, Norbert Brüggemann, Meike Kasten, Arndt Rolfs, Christine Klein, The LIPAD Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,710,545
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#1,529
of 12,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,209
of 431,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#56
of 643 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 643 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.