↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Maneuvers for Anterior Canal BPPV Canalithiasis: Three-Dimensional Simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Maneuvers for Anterior Canal BPPV Canalithiasis: Three-Dimensional Simulations
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2021.740599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Bhandari, Rajneesh Bhandari, Herman Kingma, Michael Strupp

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Anterior canal BPPV is a rare BPPV variant. Various diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers have been described for its management. The aim of this study was to use three-dimensional simulation models to visualize otoconial debris movement within the anterior canal during diagnostic tests and different liberatory maneuvers. This can help to optimize existing treatment maneuvers and help in the development of better management protocols. Methods: Based on reconstructed MRI images and fluid dynamics, a 3D dynamic simulation model (as a function of time) was developed and applied. Simulations of the supine head-hanging test for diagnosis of ac-BPPV were studied. Three repositioning maneuvers were simulated: 1) the Yacovino maneuver and its modifications, 2) the reverse Epley maneuver and 3) the short canal repositioning (CRP) maneuver. Results: The simulation showed that the supine head-hanging test is a good test for diagnosis of ac-BPPV affecting both labyrinths and demonstrated why there is no inversion of nystagmus on sitting up. The Yacovino maneuver was seen to be an effective treatment option for ac-BPPV without having to determine the side involved. However, simulations showed that the classical Yacovino maneuver carried a risk of canal switch to the posterior canal. To overcome this risk, a modified Yacovino maneuver is suggested. The reverse Epley maneuver was not an effective treatment. Short CRP is useful in ac-BPPV treatment; however, it requires determination of side of involvement. Conclusion: The 3D simulator of the movement of the otoconial debris presented here can be used to test the mechanism of action and the theoretical efficacy of existing diagnostic tests and maneuvers as well as to develop new treatment maneuvers to optimize BPPV treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 18 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 32%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,429,671
of 24,506,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,628
of 13,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,644
of 424,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#102
of 690 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,506,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 690 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.