You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanical thrombectomy of large vessel occlusion using adjustable vs. self-expanding stent-retriever—Comparison of Tigertriever device with stent-like stent-retrievers: A propensity score analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2022.1032307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Piotr Piasecki, Marek Wierzbicki, Jerzy Narloch, Aleksander Dębiec, Jacek Staszewski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,785,886
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,874
of 14,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,975
of 470,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#98
of 651 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 651 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.