You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Harmonization of multi-scanner in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy: ENIGMA consortium task group considerations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2022.1045678 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley D. Harris, Houshang Amiri, Mariana Bento, Ronald Cohen, Christopher R. K. Ching, Christina Cudalbu, Emily L. Dennis, Arne Doose, Stefan Ehrlich, Ivan I. Kirov, Ralf Mekle, Georg Oeltzschner, Eric Porges, Roberto Souza, Friederike I. Tam, Brian Taylor, Paul M. Thompson, Yann Quidé, Elisabeth A. Wilde, John Williamson, Alexander P. Lin, Brenda Bartnik-Olson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 7 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,482,984
of 23,954,951 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#3,339
of 12,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,328
of 437,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#55
of 635 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,954,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 635 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.