↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Poor and Favorable Outcome Prediction With Machine Learning After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing Poor and Favorable Outcome Prediction With Machine Learning After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2022.737667
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias A. Mutke, Vince I. Madai, Adam Hilbert, Esra Zihni, Arne Potreck, Charlotte S. Weyland, Markus A. Möhlenbruch, Sabine Heiland, Peter A. Ringleb, Simon Nagel, Martin Bendszus, Dietmar Frey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Unknown 14 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,156,937
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,278
of 12,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,095
of 441,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#250
of 737 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 737 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.