You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rescue intracranial stenting for acute ischemic stroke after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2023.1023089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junxiu Cai, Hai Xu, Rongzhou Xiao, Liping Hu, Ping Xu, Xianbin Guo, Yu Xie, Min Pan, Jie Tang, Qingtao Gong, Yan Liu, Rong Su, Jiahua Deng, Li Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,179,145
of 25,235,400 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,770
of 14,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,074
of 469,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#280
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.