↓ Skip to main content

Novel compound heterozygous mutations of LAMA2-limb–girdle muscular dystrophy: A case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel compound heterozygous mutations of LAMA2-limb–girdle muscular dystrophy: A case report and literature review
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2023.1078151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duo-Zi Wang, Bing-Hu Li, Qiong Ma, Zhou Yu, Kai Chen, Ying He, Song Tan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,069,532
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#6,217
of 12,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,431
of 360,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#169
of 618 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 618 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.