↓ Skip to main content

Identification and cross-validation of autophagy-related genes in cardioembolic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and cross-validation of autophagy-related genes in cardioembolic stroke
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2023.1097623
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yufang Yang, Min Zhang, Ziqing Li, Shen He, Xueqi Ren, Linmei Wang, Zhifei Wang, Shi Shu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#19,603,046
of 24,969,131 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,993
of 14,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,784
of 373,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#236
of 643 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,969,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 643 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.