↓ Skip to main content

Cryptogenic recurrent spontaneous intracranial epidural hematoma: A case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryptogenic recurrent spontaneous intracranial epidural hematoma: A case report and literature review
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2023.1123108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Xu, Ya Xue, Xiaofeng Chao, Zhenglou Chen, Yunjiang Wang, Xuqi Huo, Xiang Ji, Hongshen Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2023.
All research outputs
#16,786,480
of 24,690,130 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#7,499
of 13,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,780
of 412,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#257
of 691 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,690,130 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 691 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.