You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case report: Mitochondrial trifunctional protein deficiency caused by HADHB gene mutation (c.1175C>T) characterized by higher brain dysfunction followed by neuropathy, presented gadolinium enhancement on brain imaging in an adult patient
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2023.1187822 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruoyi Ishikawa, Masahiro Nakamori, Megumi Takenaka, Shiro Aoki, Yu Yamazaki, Akihiro Hashiguchi, Hiroshi Takashima, Hirofumi Maruyama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#19,674,156
of 25,051,161 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#8,056
of 14,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,968
of 365,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#228
of 604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,051,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.