↓ Skip to main content

Modeling and in vivo experimental validation of 1,064 nm laser interstitial thermal therapy on brain tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling and in vivo experimental validation of 1,064 nm laser interstitial thermal therapy on brain tissue
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2023.1237394
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng Cao, Dingsheng Shi, Ding Li, Zhoule Zhu, Junming Zhu, Jianmin Zhang, Ruiliang Bai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#22,025,736
of 24,573,729 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#10,065
of 13,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,054
of 171,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#126
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,573,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.