You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stratification of patients with Menière’s disease based on eye movement videos recorded from the beginning of vertigo attacks and contrast-enhanced MRI findings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2023.1348177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuya Ueno, Takao Imai, Kayoko Higashi-Shingai, Yumi Ohta, Takashi Sato, Takefumi Kamakura, Yoshiyuki Ozono, Hidenori Inohara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,660,335
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#616
of 14,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,305
of 334,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#9
of 583 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 583 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.