↓ Skip to main content

Application of a nomogram model for the prediction of 90-day poor outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of a nomogram model for the prediction of 90-day poor outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2024.1259973
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xia Li, Chen Li, Ao-fei Liu, Chang-chun Jiang, Yi-qun Zhang, Yun-e Liu, Ying-ying Zhang, Hao-yang Li, Wei-jian Jiang, Jin Lv

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,505,958
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#9,110
of 14,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,736
of 151,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#130
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.